[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-65?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035008#comment-13035008
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-65:
-----------------------------------
Looks reasonable though "new Quad(g,s,p,o)" is very cheap.
It'll still need Quads because of find().
Could you give some more background information as to the Quadruple abstraction
(mailing list preferably - it's specifically about this JIRA)? Be helpful to
understand context for when we change internal abstractions in any next major
version.
> Provide add and remove methods with nodes as paramaters in DatasetGraph
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-65
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-65
> Project: Jena
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: ARQ
> Reporter: Laurent Pellegrino
> Assignee: Andy Seaborne
> Labels: api, arq
> Attachments: arq-add-delete.patch
>
>
> From an instance of DatasetGraphTDB for example, it is possible to add or to
> remove quads with a Quad as parameter. However if we have the set of nodes
> associated to a Quad (g, s, p, o), it is not possible to directly add or
> delete a quad by using these nodes. In order to do that we have to create a
> new Quad with the nodes. I think it would be nice to provide an add(Node g,
> Node s, Node p, Node o) and a delete(Node g, Node s, Node p, Node o). First,
> to be consistent because you already provide it for contains(Node g, Node s,
> Node p, Node o), find(Node g, Node s, Node p, Node o) and deleteAny(Node g,
> Node s, Node p, Node o). But also because it offers the possibility to avoid
> to create Quads for people who provide their own Quadruple abstraction (which
> uses Jena Nodes).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
