It's also 1.6 -> 1.5, in spite of the documentation that barely mentions it. The fastutil guys use it.
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > On 03/08/11 16:07, Benson Margulies wrote: >> >> There's retroweaver ... > > Is that bytecode 1.5 => byte code 1.4? > >> >> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Simon Helsen<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Andy, >>> >>> a quick summary of our situation. Our current release (June 2011) >>> supports >>> Java 5 and it is still in the air if we will require Java 6 for our next >>> release. Our problem is mostly customers still using WAS 6.x which is >>> based >>> on Java 5. I cannot give a firmer answer at this point. At worst, we >>> won't >>> upgrade our TDB version :-) > > Simon, > > Thanks for the background. > > It's the library function available that'll be the issue. TxTDB does not > use Java6 because it must as far as I know - it does use some Java6 library > stuff but I haven't investigated alternatives. > > Andy >
