[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-91?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13087171#comment-13087171
 ] 

Simon Helsen commented on JENA-91:
----------------------------------

Paolo,

ok, so I applied your patch and executed it without problems (Windows 7 / 64 
bit and IBM JRE 6). However, when looking at the test code, I notice you only 
entertain 1 writerb (and N readers), is that right? My test scenario executes 
many readers and writers at the same time. We deliberately removed our own 
conservative N-1 read/write locking because our expectation is that a 
transactional system will manage the locking internally with as little 
contention as possible.

Perhaps we are not starting from the same premise

Simon

> extremely large buffer is being created in ObjectFileStorage
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENA-91
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-91
>             Project: Jena
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: TDB
>         Environment: Windows (and I presume any little endian system)
>            Reporter: Simon Helsen
>            Assignee: Andy Seaborne
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: TestTransSystem.patch
>
>
> I tried to debug the OME and check why a bytebuffer is causing my native 
> memory to explode in almost no time. It all seems to happen in this bit of 
> code in com.hp.hpl.jena.tdb.base.objectfile.ObjectFileStorage (lines 243 
> onwards)
>   // No - it's in the underlying file storage.
>         lengthBuffer.clear() ;
>         int x = file.read(lengthBuffer, loc) ;
>         if ( x != 4 )
>             throw new 
> FileException("ObjectFile.read("+loc+")["+filesize+"]["+file.size()+"]: 
> Failed to read the length : got "+x+" bytes") ;
>         int len = lengthBuffer.getInt(0) ;
>         ByteBuffer bb = ByteBuffer.allocate(len) ;
> My debugger shows that x==4. It also shows the lengthBuffer has the following 
> content: [111, 110, 61, 95]. This amounts to the value of len=1869495647, 
> which is rather a lot :-) Obviously, the next statement (ByteBuffer.allocate) 
> causes the OME.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to