On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 22:24 +0100, Andy Seaborne wrote: 
> 
> >
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: Re: Starting fuseki from a configuration file
> > Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 20:56:59 +0100
> > From: Paolo Castagna <[email protected]>
> > Reply-To: [email protected]
> > To: [email protected]
> >
> > Dave Reynolds wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 17:13 +0100, Chris Clarke wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I'm struggling to get fuseki to start and read config from a 
> >>> configuration file (as documented at 
> >>> http://openjena.org/wiki/Fuseki#Running_a_Fuseki_Server and 
> >>> http://openjena.org/wiki/Fuseki#Fuseki_Configuration_File)
> >>>
> >>> I'm doing:
> >>>
> >>> $ svn co http://jena.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/jena/Fuseki/trunk fuseki
> >>
> >> Fuseki, like all the Jena modules, is now maintained in the Apache
> >> infrastructure:
> >>   https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jena/Jena2/Fuseki
> >
> > By the way, this happened to me as well a couple of times (browsers cache 
> > URLs).
> >
> > Maybe we could delete stuff in SourceForge (history will remain anyway) and
> > replace it with just a README.txt file with the message "moved here...".
> > This is what I usually do (for example: https://github.com/castagna/LARQ) to
> > avoid these problems. History is always there:
> > https://github.com/castagna/LARQ/commits/master
> >
> > Paolo
> 
> +1

+1 

> This is a signficant step so I suggest we need project consensus by the 
> 3 day rule, including discussion of alternatives.  Are there other ways 
> of tombstoning to consider?

I'd also be OK with Paolo's alternative of just deleting the build files
(and adding a MOVED/README). Less effective but does make history
browsing easier.

Dave


Reply via email to