Hi Andy Andy Seaborne wrote: > On 12/10/11 18:05, Paolo Castagna wrote: >> Andy Seaborne wrote: >>> On 09/10/11 22:26, Paolo Castagna wrote: >>>> From my (and Talis) point of view: >>>> >>>> - scalability and performance (loading and querying) >> >> Something like this: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-140 >> ... goes below "scalability and performance". :-) > > I don't see how copying a rambling discussion email helps. All it does > for me is to inhibit discussion of this or any other idea on the mailing > list.
I don't understand why having a JIRA open classified at "Wish" inhibit discussion. It is a place where discussion can happen. Past messages in the dev mailing lists tend to be forgotten and people can missed them. Could you please explain better why a JIRA issue classified as "Wish" inhibit discussion? I'll delete the issue if that is a way to continue the discussion on caching for SPARQL endpoint, but first, I'd like to understand why it inhibits it. I certainly I am the last person who wants to inhibit discussion on anything, especially on a caching layer for SPARQL endpoints, especially on something who is going to improve performances or scalability. :-) > >> Should we add a "caching layer for SPARQL endpoints" to our roadmap page? > > There's only one goal on *my* roadmap : > > * Graduate from incubator. We should have that as well on the Roadmap. And, we should have JIRA issues open related to that. JIRA issues such as: "Rolling out the first Apache release" with sub-task help others to see what's missing and those who are keen to help, do so. Paolo > > Andy
