[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13127565#comment-13127565
 ] 

Paolo Castagna commented on JENA-139:
-------------------------------------

I was not 100% sure that none of the files there was needed at runtime. 
But, if that is not the case, great. Less unused stuff in the jars is better.
Ideally we should have 0 unused stuff at runtime in our jars. :-)
                
> Remove vocabulary/dublin* from the jena jar file
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENA-139
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-139
>             Project: Jena
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: Jena
>            Reporter: Simon Helsen
>            Assignee: Andy Seaborne
>
> Would it be possible to remove the vocabulary/dublin* from the jena jar file 
> in future releases? 
> These vocabularies are unfortunately not friendly for commercial products 
> because of the restrictions put forth by DCMI (see 
> http://dublincore.org/about/copyright/). It is not a problem if they are 
> included in the distribution.
> I am not entirely sure what needs to be done, but it seems that the pom.xml 
> for jena needs to be edited to explicitly filter  vocabulary/dublin*. I 
> presume that some sort of filtering rule in 
>    <resource>
>          <directory>vocabularies</directory>
>          <targetPath>vocabularies</targetPath>
>          <filtering>false</filtering>
>        </resource>
> would eliminate it. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to