On 24/10/11 07:25, Paolo Castagna wrote: > Ian Dickinson (Commented) (JIRA) wrote: >> Ian Dickinson commented on JENA-36: >> ----------------------------------- >> >>> We should probably remove the build.xml file. Any reason not to >>> do so? >> Has there been a decision not to support builds other than using >> Maven? I use Maven quite happily, but I realise that not all of the >> rest of the world does! I would suggest that dropping non-Maven >> builds - a decision which may affect some current Jena users - >> should be at least ratified by a vote (unless there has already >> been one and I've forgotten it) > > Hi Ian, hi all, I don't know if there are good reasons to have an Ant > build.xml for Jena, if there are, please, share them with me and the > others. I'm just pointing out that for something that has a direct effect on existing end-users, we should ratify the decision by a vote rather than make it by default. It would also give an opportunity for users who care about keeping an ant build script to volunteer to maintain it.
Ian -- ____________________________________________________________ Ian Dickinson Epimorphics Ltd, Bristol, UK mailto:[email protected] http://www.epimorphics.com cell: +44-7786-850536 landline: +44-1275-399069 ------------------------------------------------------------ Epimorphics Ltd. is a limited company registered in England (no. 7016688). Registered address: Court Lodge, 105 High St, Portishead, Bristol BS20 6PT, UK
