[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13143980#comment-13143980
]
Paolo Castagna commented on JENA-36:
------------------------------------
I usually do not log when I write test cases.
If I want to test for an expected error, I make sure I switched off logging
just around that test case.
In some of our test suites the test cases are generated from a manifest,
therefore it's not easy to selectively switch off the specific logging for a
few test cases only.
@Andy, do you have a better or different approach from what I've just done
(considering this specific situation and the existing ARP test suite)?
> log4j.properties can be a surprise
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-36
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-36
> Project: Jena
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Benson Margulies
> Assignee: Paolo Castagna
> Priority: Minor
>
> The jena jar, and perhaps others, has a log4j.properties on behalf of the
> commands. A little classpath confusion can end up with this at the head of
> the line of an app that is incorporating the jar.
> It would be more better, if you ask me, for the commands to use the -D for
> log4j to ask for a different file name, and leave *that* in the jar.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
