Thorsten Möller wrote: > Am 30.11.2011 um 10:39 schrieb Andy Seaborne: > >> == Version number >> >> I think it's worth bumping the minor version number on ARQ and Jena - the >> jar files have changed name format; the maven artifacts have different >> names, ARQ is SPARQL 1.1 (query, update) complete. >> >> JenaTop 0 >> IRI 0.9.0 >> Jena 2.7.0 >> ARQ 2.9.0 >> LARQ? >> Download 2.7.0 (in line with Jena core) > > Does it mean version numbers of the download and Jena-core are kept in line > just for this release or also for future releases? What if you want to > release a new download (because of a critical bug in a non Jena-core module) > while the version of Jena-core has not changed - fourth level 2.7.0.1?
Hi Thorsten, I am not sure I completely understand your question. But, let's say a critical bug is found in jena-core 2.7.0. We can fix it there and release: jena-core 2.7.1. And then decide to roll-out a new Jena download (a.k.a. apache-jena 2.7.1). Why do you think a fourth-level version number is necessary? Cheers, Paolo > > Thorsten
