On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Damian Steer <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 09/01/12 11:26, Andy Seaborne wrote: > >> There is one matter to do still - the code is java-packaged under >> "com.hp.hpl.jena" and a small amount of "org.openjena". > > +1 to this move, post-graduation. >
+1 to 'post'. Absolutely not required to graduate. >> I wouldn't want to be too ambitious for Jena3 or it will never >> happen but adding in other significant discontinuities at this >> point would be good. There are lots of internal changes I can think >> of, but they aren't large external changes dependent on a major >> version number change. > > Agree that piling on changes would be a bad idea for 'Jena 3'. We > might want to consider moving classes between artifacts at that point? > I'm thinking of moving RIOT into core, or at least out of ARQ. > > Damian > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAk8K4JwACgkQAyLCB+mTtymoUgCghotDE1pXeIb81FlBmgEPf0Y3 > iq8AoP0l3tDPFYGZaxXpbPMXbyCM/Ugl > =1wcz > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
