Robert said: > Even if we were using 0.2.1 I think we would prefer not to use assembler > descriptions > as that would allow users to break things by changing the file. Also we > configure > differently depending on the command line arguments our code received and > I don't know that assembler would allow us to cope with that nicely > (though I think we can call arbitrary code?)
Depending on the details of who runs the assembler and how much control you have over where they get the config from, one trick (which Eyeball uses) is to have the command-line args edit the config before assembly. Chris -- "It does not need to take events in their correct order." /Hexwood/ Epimorphics Ltd, http://www.epimorphics.com Registered address: Court Lodge, 105 High Street, Portishead, Bristol BS20 6PT Epimorphics Ltd. is a limited company registered in England (number 7016688)
