Andy Seaborne wrote: > On 08/01/12 19:27, Andy Seaborne wrote: >> The release of core/ARQ etc. hasn't lead to any immediate disasters (but >> there is still time!) so we can move on to TDB. >> >> As far as I'm concerned, the code in the current snapshot and in SVN is >> release candidate code (JENA-102 is fixed) and if people don't test it >> (I've pinged jena-users@), then they risk it taking longer to get a >> released version with fixes. >> >> I need to write the transaction API documentation and there is something >> odd in the prefix handling but as far as I can see, it's been odd for >> some time, maybe all time; it needs reworking, not fixing so shouldn't >> block a release. >> >> Andy >> >> PS Fuseki snapshot is using TDB transactions now. > > I'm going to start the release process for TDB and Fuseki. I'll call > the vote as soon as possible.
Thank you Andy. Do you have a plan for LARQ? It's just a small extension for ARQ, therefore it does not need a full .zip distribution. Or, that is necessary anyway? Probably, just the -source-release.zip is necessary as per jena-iri, for example. Do you agree? In relation to Fuseki, JENA-63 is still open/pending: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-63 But, if Fuseki is released first... LARQ cannot be included in it and JENA-63 can only be closed with the next Fuseki release. Paolo > > Andy
