On 01/02/12 15:56, Andy Seaborne wrote:
[[ the processing, storage and retrieval of semantic web data ]]
which does not say "publish" which I would have if it included
"linked data".
Include 'publish' either way: we include serialisers after all.
s/retrieval/publication/ ?
[[
the processing, storage and publication of semantic web data
]]
That lumps all of the model API, query handling and the inference
machinery under "processing". Which might be OK, because the alternative
gets to be a bit of a laundry list:
[[
accessing, storing, querying, publishing and reasoning with semantic web
data
]]
Second text (same)
Alternative: s/semantic web data/linked data/
I chose "semantic web" as it's about the base technology, not the
manifestation, "linked data" - this isn't primarily for marketing.
I'm indifferent having never been that keen on either label. I like
the 'web' in semantic web and 'data' in linked data :-)
+1
But putting in our own terminology like "data web" kinda begs
explanation. "web of data" or "data web" are a bit wide.
Overall I think this is fine. One suggestion: should we mention
supporting standards / recommendations? I don't want to commit us to
supporting all W3C recs of course (!), but I'd consider any
contribution that improved standards support a good fit with jena.
Good point - that is an important part of Jena.
Not sure if this:
[[
the processing, storage and publication of semantic web data through the
use of standards
]],
meaning de facto and de jure standards, is any better as tends to go too
far the other way as suggesting standards only.
Any wording suggestions?
[[
accessing, storing, querying, publishing and reasoning with semantic web
data in concordance with relevant standards
]]
(or ..
[[
accessing, storing, querying, publishing and reasoning with semantic web
data while under the influence of standards
]]
:)
Ian
