Stanbol is using freemarker as well. To satisfy the license condition I think the notice file must contain an acknowledgement in the notice file and the license in the license file.
Reto On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > On 22/02/12 12:59, Benson Margulies wrote: >> >> The 4-clause BSD license does not seem to appear on >> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html at all. So I think you need >> to go to legal. > > > Thanks - and it's not 4 clause BSD in the usual sense. It's their license, > it is vaguely BSD as they claim but it's a different 4 clauses. > > >> I confess that I don't understand the problem with JSP pages in the >> first place. All the pieces you need are either Apache or Eclipse in >> my experience. > > > Jetty uses Glassfish to get it's JSP code and, eventually, CDDL (?). And you > end up shipping ecj. That said, the whole Jasper trail is quite confusing. > The licensing needs tracking down because it's redistribution, not just use > of. > > It may be possible to pick out of the Tomcat code, but the packaging seemed > to lead me to Tomcat specific code eventually. Switching wholesale to > embedded Tomcat is possible, but quite a lot larger than embedded Jetty > (extra 3-4Mbytes in 15M). > > But I'm not a fan of JSPs anyway so this is an opportunity to not have them > at all. > > Andy
