Hi,
I wrote a query like this and sent it through Fuseki 0.1.0. It came back with
results for "?n0 ?n1 ?nc" and dropped the other variables.
SELECT ?n0 ?n1 (COUNT(*) as ?nc) ?n2 ?n3 ?n4 ?n5 ?n6
WHERE {
...
} GROUP BY ?n0 ?n1
Its probably by design, but its confusing to me because in analogous SQL I
believe the behavior would be to calculate the ?nc result but return all rows,
its just that the aggregrate count would be the same for any row where ?n0 or
?n1 has been previously returned.
Does the SPARQL spec define the behavior here, or is up to implementors?
Thanks,
Tim
