Maatary Daniel OKOUYA wrote: > By the way I have some requirement that makes that the language used > for ontology representation or for the content language could be > anything. Hence, i can not impose Jena formalism throughout the all > system.
"Jena formalism" is just a representation of RDF inside Java. If you're using RDF and writing in Java, why can you "impose" this formalism? > I need to have some abstract intermediary representation. That would be a Jena model (or graph); it's pretty abstract, just a bunch of triples with some convenient accessors. I concur with Dave's remark about RDF/XML; don't think in terms of XML, it will make your life too complicated. That's what the Jena parsers and writers are for: so you don't have to worry about the details of surface syntax. Chris -- "I don't want to know what the Structuralists think! I want /Archer's Goon/ to know what YOU think!" Epimorphics Ltd, http://www.epimorphics.com Registered address: Court Lodge, 105 High Street, Portishead, Bristol BS20 6PT Epimorphics Ltd. is a limited company registered in England (number 7016688)
