Am 05.09.2011 um 22:44 schrieb Andy Seaborne: > There has been an old copy of RDQL in ARQ, although it's use is strongly > discouraged (unclear formal semantics; integrated into evaluation as a query > language by some quite fragile hacks). > > It's now been removed from ARQ completely. The code is available in the > Archive area of ARQ SVN. It will not be maintained and it will not in the > ARQ distribution.
Wouldn't it be sufficient to mark the last state before the removal by a tag in SVN (rather than having the jar in the working copy just hanging around)? Is there a need for having an additional file-based archive if SVN is the archive? Thorsten
