On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 03:48 +0100, Monika Solanki wrote: 
> I  am using the generic rule reasoner layered on top of pellet. The TBox and
> ABox for my use case are in separate namespaces. I would like to add the
> most useful results from the inferred model back into the ABox and persist
> it. These results are those which have all subjects in the ABox namespace
> and do not include bnodes in the subject or object position. I do not want
> to persist the complete inferred model as the new ABox. Is there a way to
> filter the results through calls to the reasoner rather than manipulate the
> results in the code?

Not that I can think of unless there is a limited number of ABox subject
nodes - in which case you could list those via the base model then ask
for their properties via the inference model.

You can use filterDrop to filter results as a stream.

Dave


Reply via email to