On 6 Oct 2011, at 13:18, Eric Feliksik wrote: > Hi Damian, > > Thanks a lot for this contribution! I will have time to test this code next > week -- It looks good, I almost gave up hope :-)
No problem. > comment says you'd be happier to use stream reader, now it is > using XMLEventReader -- but isn't this also streaming? It's still not like > DOM, right? Maybe i'll be able to escape the event stream (when I finished > the relevant RDF/XML sub-part) by throwing an exception -- what do you > think? (I'm not very experienced with XML processing). Oh, ignore that comment. The code would have been a bit cleaner using XMLStreamReader, but in order to support both I had to use XMLEventReader. (Streams can be converted to event readers, but not the other way) You are correct, both stream. Event reader encapsulates the low level events of stream reader in event objects, which is nicer in many situations. Damian
