I now have this support working and configurable using a --from switch on the command line or ARQ.setContext(Fuseki.enableFromClauses, true) programmatically. I have submitted a patch with some tests for this as JENA-162 [1], if this can be reviewed and include in trunk ASAP we'd be extremely grateful
Regards, Rob Vesse [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-162 -----Original Message----- From: Robert Vesse [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 1:07 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Adding FROM/FROM NAMED support to Fuseki? It works fine with a persistent TDB disk based dataset so I'm going to assume the changes work. I'll write up some test cases over the next few hours and then submit the patch to JIRA Does anyone have a preference whether I make this behavior configurable? i.e. add a command line switch which disables FROM/FROM NAMED support or shall I leave this up to you guys to decide at a later date? Cheers, Rob -----Original Message----- From: Andy Seaborne [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andy Seaborne Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 6:17 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Adding FROM/FROM NAMED support to Fuseki? On 09/11/11 19:16, Robert Vesse wrote: > So following this up further. I got the 0.2.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT building, > made my changes to enable FROM/FROM NAMED and ran it locally via Eclipse > > I loaded the same data, in the same way using a TDB memory dataset (--mem > option) like my previous email and still saw the same incorrect behavior, > FROM clauses do not seem to be respected by TDB Not quite right. "--mem" creates an ARQ-based in-memory database unrelated to TDB. --loc triggers TDB. Try a small persistent one. (I haven't tried but --loc="--mem--" may work - it's the name of the in-memory location) > > So what I found was that I did need to also alter decideDataset() so that > DynamicDatasets.dynamicDataset() will be used to create the dataset and then > that exhibits the correct behavior. > > I will write up some tests for this and then go ahead and submit a patch via > JIRA if that is ok? Yes - that's the new workflow. Andy > > Rob Vesse
