On 14/03/12 22:09, Svatopluk Šperka wrote:
Thanks for a response !
What you are saying would mean that for rule [23] 'ORDER' 'BY'
OrderCondition+ (http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/), SPARQL
endpoint should accept "orderby" but for example dbpedia running on
Virtuoso is not the case, so I guess that it is not the way the
grammar is generally understood.
Yes - ORDER BY could be ORDERBY
or
ORDER BY
or
ORDER # comments
BY
Stardog uses Sesame's OpenRDF to
check the queries and it does not accept "not exists".
You mean "notexists" or it does not accept "not exists" (one space,
lower case)? Both are legal. Maybe stardog isn't using the latest
Sesame parser; or you may wish file a bug report for Sesame bu
Is there any reason why Jena generates "not exists" instead of "not
exists" ?
No strong reason - it uses the internal function name which happens to
be "notexists" as it's legal for the SPARQL syntax. I'll change it as
there is no reason to be that form.
Andy
Svatopluk Šperka
