yes, I insert individuals in every step.

thanks!

>----Messaggio originale----
>Da: [email protected]
>Data: 30/03/2012 14.47
>A: "[email protected]"<[email protected]>
>Cc: <[email protected]>
>Ogg: Re: Re: Re: Jena slow ontology population
>
>So all updates are A-box related?
>
>On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:22 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> 
wrote:
>> Thanks a lot for your reply!
>> As you have assumed, I don't use neither TDB or SDB...I have an in memory-
>> model at runtime.
>> It seems to me that my model does not require complicate inferences...at 
every
>> step,
>> it extracts a tuple from the DB and generates the corresponding individuals
>> with:
>> model.createIndividual; the properties are added using the addProperty
>> method.
>>
>> The only thing that can be complicated to be calculated is that, if an
>> individual has the same
>> id of the last one processed, I extract the latter from the ontology to add
>> some properties...
>>
>> thanks a lot again!
>>
>> Paola
>>
>>
>>
>>>----Messaggio originale----
>>>Da: [email protected]
>>>Data: 30/03/2012 13.56
>>>A: "[email protected]"<[email protected]>
>>>Cc: <[email protected]>
>>>Ogg: Re: Re: Jena slow ontology population
>>>
>>>your hardware looks good, what type of inference does your model
>>>require for updates?
>>>
>>>Pellet is a very powerful reasoning system which can result in
>>>significant computational complexity for the subsystem to deal with
>>>depending on your level of inference that is of course. So you better
>>>know exactly what level of reasoning your application requires in
>>>advance to optimize the system at run-time.
>>>
>>>TBD, SDB are persistent storage options, from what you have just said
>>>I can assume you are using an in-memory model at run-time.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:41 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Marco, thanks a lot for your help! :-)
>>>>
>>>> Version of Jena: 2.6.4
>>>> OS: Linux 64 bit
>>>> reasoner: Pellet
>>>> TDB and SDB: I don't use them, I believed that they were related to RDF
>> while
>>>> I'm using OWL, but maybe I can be wrong...
>>>>
>>>> current hw:
>>>>  *-CPU
>>>>          description: CPU
>>>>          product: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU
>>>>          version: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620
>>>>          slot: CPU 1
>>>>          size: 2400MHz
>>>>          capacity: 2400MHz
>>>>          width: 64 bits
>>>>          clock: 133MHz
>>>>  *-memory
>>>>          description: System Memory
>>>>          physical id: 24
>>>>          slot: System board or motherboard
>>>>          size: 8GiB
>>>>
>>>> If you want to know other information, please tell me! And thanks a lot
>> again!
>>>>
>>>> Paola
>>>>
>>>>>----Messaggio originale----
>>>>>Da: [email protected]
>>>>>Data: 30/03/2012 11.36
>>>>>A: <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"<villa.
va@libero.
>>>> it>
>>>>>Ogg: Re: Jena slow ontology population
>>>>>
>>>>>can you please be a bit more specific about the configuration you have
>>>>>currently installed? e.g. version of Jena, back end type (TDB, SDB,
>>>>>in-memory), current hardware, and OS (32bit, 64bit, linux,
>>>>>windows,mac), and type of reasoner you use.
>>>>>
>>>>>---
>>>>>Marco Neumann
>>>>>KONA
>>>>>
>>>>>Join us at SemTech Biz in San Francisco June 3-7 2012 and save 15%
>>>>>with the lotico community discount code 'STMN'
>>>>>http://www.lotico.com/evt/SemTechSF2012/
>>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 4:22 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Dear users,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am new to Jena and have a problem with Jena OWL-API. I have written
>> some
>>>>>> simple Java code that:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) extracts some tuples (around 1 million tuples) of data from a 
database
>>>>>> 2) puts each of them in an ontology file using Jena library. In
>> particular,
>>>> it
>>>>>> takes every tuple and inserts
>>>>>> every element in a class of the ontology file, by using methods like
>>>>>> createIndividual, addproperty, model.write.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The insertion phase is very quick when my program starts, but the
>>>> performances
>>>>>> became worse and worse as
>>>>>> time goes by. The DB man has told me that the database has no problems. 
I
>>>> have
>>>>>> run the program with 5 gigabytes
>>>>>> of RAM...it simply ends up to use them all. Is that normal? Do I have 
to
>>>> use a
>>>>>> more powerful PC to manage such
>>>>>> data? I can give you more details about my problem if you tell me what 
I
>>>> have
>>>>>> to look for exactly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks a lot,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Paola
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>
>>>
>>>---
>>>Marco Neumann
>>>KONA
>>>
>>>Join us at SemTech Biz in San Francisco June 3-7 2012 and save 15%
>>>with the lotico community discount code 'STMN'
>>>http://www.lotico.com/evt/SemTechSF2012/
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>
>
>---
>Marco Neumann
>KONA
>
>Join us at SemTech Biz in San Francisco June 3-7 2012 and save 15%
>with the lotico community discount code 'STMN'
>http://www.lotico.com/evt/SemTechSF2012/
>


Reply via email to