Hi, > Suggestion: backport f50316b which is pretty small and should be > safe;
done > Nickolay’s patch (if extended as mentioned above) would be about as > good for a backport but has not been tested in trunk. as this is not even in trunk yet, I don't include this patch > I hope it is not too > late for 1.480.1; if so, keep it in mind for 1.480.2. will try to keep in mind and include other possible fixes in 1.480.2 @Kohsuke would you mind re-spin RC to include this fix? It passed all tests [1]. Thanks Vojta [1] https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/HTS-Jenkins-LTS/32 (will be published in a few hours, out build publisher lags today ;-()
