The problem with a flow is that the flow can be dynamic - so having to specify 
the jobs may lead to incorrect jobs being aggregated - or maintinaing duplicate 
information.

It also appears to rely upon getDownStreamRelationship that relies on 
fingerprints to work unless overridden.

Perhaps this should be moved to the dev list...

/James

From: jenkinsci-us...@googlegroups.com 
[mailto:jenkinsci-us...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of nicolas de loof
Sent: 30 August 2013 15:52
To: jenkinsci-us...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Build flow plugin: How to copy results from downstream jobs

I don't want to follow this direction, as I know people won't consider the 
warning on documentation.

AggregatedTestResultPublisher can be configured with a set of jobs, maybe this 
require some tweaks on UI, not sure (sorry, don't have much time to investigate 
on this topic today)

2013/8/30 John Russell <jjruss...@gmail.com<mailto:jjruss...@gmail.com>>
I see the class javadoc for that class but how would I use that to actually 
aggregate the junit tests to report in the build-flow plugin?

Is it also possible to discourage people in the documentation and yet leave the 
workspace there so its possible?

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:22 AM, nicolas de loof 
<nicolas.del...@gmail.com<mailto:nicolas.del...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I indeed removed workspace support especially to discourage such a "write some 
custom jenkins code using DSL" approach.
build-flow is about orchestrating jobs, not creating custom plugins

junit aggregator is using the original location for junit results, and 
dynamically aggregating. It doesn't copy to local project.

2013/8/30 John Russell <jjruss...@gmail.com<mailto:jjruss...@gmail.com>>
Teilo, When did build flow stop having a workspace? I finally got this to work 
by archiving all of the junit files from the downstream jobs onto the master, 
running build-flow on the master, and directly copying the files from the 
archive of the downstream build to build flow and running the junit results 
post build step.

So this won't work anymore? If there is no workspace how would any junit result 
post build step work?


On Friday, August 30, 2013 4:14:04 AM UTC-4, teilo wrote:
The BuildFlow doesn't use a workspace anymore[1] - so your workaround most 
likely won't work as you expect.

I'm not convinced that this is a good thing as like you I would like to show 
test results in the main flow job - not have another job that is just aggregate 
& report.

On Monday, 12 August 2013 20:17:54 UTC+1, John Russell wrote:
Do you guys have any idea how to pull files, specifically test results, from 
the jobs started in a build flow up to the build flow job itself so it can be 
the one that presents all of the test results?

I presume that if I can copy them from the slaves up to the workspace of the 
build flow build that the post build step of processing the test results will 
get them all. Any thoughts on how to get those files back to the master?

On Thursday, January 3, 2013 2:30:31 AM UTC-5, Nicolas De loof wrote:
sure, rescue handle whatever happens in gard block, that has no restriction on 
nested content
2013/1/3 Patrick van der Velde 
<petrikva...@gmail.com<mailto:petrikva...@gmail.com>>
Thanks for that suggestion. One question about the guard statement. Can it 
handle multiple statements? i.e. is the following allowed?

guard {
    build("job1")
    build("job2")
} rescue {
    build("finaljob")
}

or even this

guard {
    parallel(
        { build("job1a") },
        { build("job2a") },
    )

    parallel(
        { build("job1b") },
        { build("job2b") },
    )
} rescue {
    build("finaljob")
}

My script looks a bit like that last one but when I tried putting a guard 
clause around it I got the following error:










ERROR: Failed to run DSL Script

groovy.lang.MissingMethodException<http://stacktrace.jenkins-ci.org/search?query=groovy.lang.MissingMethodException>:
 No signature of method: com.cloudbees.plugins.flow.FlowDelegate.rescue() is 
applicable for argument types: (Script1$_run_closure1_closure3) values:

Removing the guard clause made it work. So I'm guessing guard can only handle 1 
item?

Thanks

Petrik

On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:16 PM, nicolas de loof 
<nicolas...@gmail.com<mailto:nicolas...@gmail.com>> wrote:
use gard+rescue so you can execute a post-job even when some jobs are unstable

2013/1/2 Patrick <petrikva...@gmail.com<mailto:petrikva...@gmail.com>>
Ok I'm going to have to amend this answer. My idea of having a separate job at 
the end to gather the results would work if it wasn't for the fact that the 
build flow plugin kills the build as soon as one of the jobs fails. That means 
I only can get the results if the build works which is not what I want. I want 
the results gathering to always take place, even if the all the build jobs 
fail. Any way to achieve this?

Thanks

Petrik


On Wednesday, 2 January 2013 11:46:54 UTC+13, Patrick wrote:
Hi

Mmm ok, I guess I could create a separate job to gather all the test results. 
Thanks for the advice :)

Regards

Petrik





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
jenkinsci-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:jenkinsci-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google 
Groups "Jenkins Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/jenkinsci-users/MX29Ld8upCs/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
jenkinsci-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:jenkinsci-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
jenkinsci-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:jenkinsci-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
jenkinsci-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:jenkinsci-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to