On 02 Dec 2013, at 19:56, Vincent Latombe <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Mads, > Hi Vincent, > this looks like a nice addition, however I would have better seen this part > of the promoted build plugin itself (adding an optional dependency to > parametrized trigger plugin). > > What do you think? My first attempt was actually to build support into the promoted builds plugin, but this exposed a circular dependency problem. Paramterized Trigger depends on Promoted Builds. Jesse suggested that I put this feature in a new plugin or that I should add it to Parameterized Trigger. I chose the first option as I think this is less intrusive. He also talked about adding support for better dependency notification but I’m not ready to build something like that at this moment. Mads.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
