The names are updated.  And I had a mistype earlier ... the package name is 
com.openshift.jenkins.plugins.pipeline.

On Thursday, November 5, 2015 at 11:05:37 AM UTC-5, [email protected] 
wrote:
>
> Thanks for the feedback Oliver.
>
> For the GID, com.openshift.jenkins works.
> For the UID, after some discussion among my team, we'll move off the 
> generic "openshift" to "openshift-pipeline", assuming there are no 
> objections.
> Correspondingly, for the package, we'll move to 
> com.openshift.jenkins.pipeline (again assuming no objections.
>
> I'll post an update when the changes are reflected in the git repo.
>
> thanks again,
> gabe
>
> On Thursday, November 5, 2015 at 6:59:23 AM UTC-5, ogondza wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to recommend changing the maven GID:UID and the java 
>> packages so it will be not conflict with other artifacts or other Jenkins 
>> plugins (the is not the only one openshift plugin for Jenkins). 
>> com.openshift.jenkins:openshift-builder/com.openshift.jenkins.plugins.builder?
>>
>> Perhaps management/tasks/steps would sound better to you than builder.
>>
>> None of that is a reason not to fork you plugin, though.
>>
>> -- 
>> oliver
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/1c0f80c9-416b-4b9f-82c2-07cd513f6819%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to