On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 7:04 AM, ogondza <ogon...@gmail.com> wrote: > I do not consider JENKINS-31718 to be a serious candidate for .3 as will > likely not make it to the core when LTS is released
We can push it to `master` today. I would urge you to reconsider. This is a potentially serious regression introduced in .2. Regressions should be exempt from the soak period requirement IMO. I also advocate for JENKINS-31649 to be included and will work on a matching fix with test to `workflow-plugin`. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CANfRfr3MstZkiqMXAPv%3DGegTG8jhnUXp3Bq20Fo0A%3DzCUc7VGw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
