I think no. JNLP3 shouldn't land and we should try to propose others fixes without it.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Daniel Beck <m...@beckweb.net> wrote: > > > On 25.04.2016, at 12:22, Arnaud Héritier <aherit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > +1000 for JENKINS-34213 + TLS certificate fixes > > Has anything changed since the March 30 project meeting, in which we > determined that JENKINS-33886[1] is serious enough to not include newer > remoting versions? I see no notable progress in that issue. > > 1: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-33886 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Jenkins Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/D7258BF4-E15B-4EB1-857B-DBF31BA4C09A%40beckweb.net > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- ----- Arnaud Héritier http://aheritier.net Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com Twitter/Skype : aheritier -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAFNCU-_AApxnyvJtGrQqWknTXNXEo6cmCwU9y1Jsw4HNtJJVXg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
