Agreed there. I'd be interested in that JEP. On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 11:47 AM Oleg Nenashev <o.v.nenas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > With the current scope of Affected components JEP would be definitely great > > On Wednesday, January 29, 2020 at 5:21:20 PM UTC+1, Chris Kilding wrote: >> >> I'm currently working out the details of JENKINS-60897, an enhancement to >> enable the folders plugin to provide an access control layer over any >> credentials provider. This would affect several components (all credential >> providers, credentials API, CasC, folders plugin, maybe more). It may also >> be relevant to other access control features Jenkins has. Therefore it might >> be worth expanding into a JEP. >> >> Thoughts? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Jenkins Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/5758c026-29d1-4339-bb37-b5d5cb8507ca%40googlegroups.com.
-- Matt Sicker Senior Software Engineer, CloudBees -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAEot4oyp_rBxfVOi8EgjB%2B1%2BsV9NqiutJr8D%2BkuGfz13gc_z-g%40mail.gmail.com.
