Anyone? Personally I am not against renaming. "simple-jenkins-operator" and "jenkins-automation-operator" are approximately the same in terms of potential confusion
On Thursday, December 3, 2020 at 7:00:48 PM UTC+1 [email protected] wrote: > Hi Jenkinsers, > > after discussions, our team has agreed in using a different name instead > of simple-jenkins-operator which may be too restrictive. > > We conducted a poll internally and it seems that we have a consensus > around "jenkins-automation-operator" . > Could you please, folks, consider that change and give any feedback? > > After that, please let us know about the change. At the moment, we haven't > pushed any code yet, and we have still our code base in a public github > repository. > > Greetings > Akram > > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/5c5bcd45-3a09-4591-8e25-2b14c86a3afdn%40googlegroups.com.
