On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 3:47 PM Baptiste Mathus <m...@batmat.net> wrote:
> Care to elaborate what you mean and how that would work? IIUC, what you're > describing would quite entail refactoring all existing "xyz-plugin > developer" groups on GitHub side? > And as you know we currently have close to no notion of github on RPU > side, like the names there are only artifactory's ones. > Yup, these realms are independent so unless you find a way to have a tamper-proof bi-directional mapping, there's no need to worry about GH permissions while dealing with upload permissions. Note that I only responded to the part around RPU. > Do you mean we should improve RPU to better manage multi-modules? In that > case, I don't disagree, but I think we should put it in a separate bucket > so we can improve the situation iteratively. > I think what James describes can be done in a very quick way (still > clean), and what you describe here seems bigger. > I am just pointing out that the use case goes beyond multiple plugins maintained by the same group, and this change can also benefit others while the mentioned limitation exists. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAMo7PtLs27A9ODjSe537Ar3pRwkTYNiFr8WHX88Kd7EQtvUSow%40mail.gmail.com.
