Jan has offered a partial reversion instead of a full one https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/6912#issuecomment-1331319966
I think that would be more appropriate here given the issue is only with one particular part of it On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 at 16:05, 'wfoll...@cloudbees.com' via Jenkins Developers <jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Thanks Basil for the message (I especially liked the references). > > I can only +1 your proposal as I was thinking about that in > https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/6912#issuecomment-1331141923. > Compared to you, I didn't take the time to move the idea further, thanks > for the effort. > > The change itself is good, it's more about the number of related issues > that could be adjusted before, i.e. just a matter of time. > > > On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 8:01:16 AM UTC-8 m...@basilcrow.com wrote: > >> The Jenkins core maintainers aspire to deliver First Customer Ship (FCS) >> <https://illumos.org/docs/contributing/quality/> quality all the time on >> the main branch <https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/7218>. The >> integration of jenkinsci/jenkins#6912 >> <https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/6912> has destabilized the >> main branch, resulting in approximately a dozen pull requests to correct >> issues with the initial integration. When the main branch is not in a >> stable state, new problems are far more likely to be introduced, a timeless >> phenomenon described by Jeff Bonwick as the Quality Death Spiral >> <https://illumos.org/docs/contributing/qds/>. The overall quality of the >> delivered software, not any one project, is what matters; therefore, I am >> proposing a revert of jenkinsci/jenkins#6912 >> <https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/6912>. >> >> There is past precedent for this: when the Jetty 10 upgrade was >> integrated, it destabilized the main branch. It was quickly reverted, then >> reintegrated later when all known issues had been addressed. The revert of >> jenkinsci/jenkins#6912 <https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/6912> >> is also intended to be temporary: once the issues caused by the original >> change are addressed (including JENKINS-70169 >> <https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-70169> and >> jenkinsci/design-library-plugin#182 >> <https://github.com/jenkinsci/design-library-plugin/issues/182>), we >> fully hope and expect for it to be reintegrated and delivered in its final >> form. >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Jenkins Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/8a1ad83d-9216-468e-9f10-a1d2aeb72d14n%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/8a1ad83d-9216-468e-9f10-a1d2aeb72d14n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAH-3Bifoc8s%2BCcSC-eTh4ocuecsHrYgo-bV17R2c%3DL3Go9VFqQ%40mail.gmail.com.
