About the 2.545 weekly release with the broken packages: As discussed in 
Matrix (jenkinsci/release), Hervé Le Meur and I are currently pairing to 
issue a new set of fixed packages and we'll remove the Docker container 
tags with "jdk17" in it.

As pointed by Tim Jacomb, re-issuing packaging should be faster than 
triggering a new 2.546 (since the correct Docker containers with JDK21 do 
NOT need any changes).

Le mercredi 7 janvier 2026 à 13:42:11 UTC+1, Damien Duportal a écrit :

> I'm forking from 
> https://groups.google.com/g/jenkinsci-dev/c/SNsd_pLk4-k/m/jQDOF-3jCgAJ as 
> it is a distinct topic than the LTS backports for 2.541.1.
>
> Context: With https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/26018, we've 
> officially started to drop support of JDK17 (e.g. requiring JDK21) to run 
> Jenkins Core.
>
> It follows the "2+2+2" Java Support Plan described in 
> https://www.jenkins.io/blog/2023/11/06/introducing-2-2-2-java-support-plan/
> .
>
> This change has been released with 2.545: 
> https://www.jenkins.io/changelog/2.545/.
>
> But it had side effects:
>
>    - There are Docker tags for the 2.545 with jdk17: it should not and 
>    requires a fix.
>    - The packaging on some Linux platforms seems to have dependency 
>    issues with JDK17/21/other JDK: 
>    https://github.com/jenkinsci/packaging/issues/729
>
>
> I'm opening this email thread to have a centralized discussion and 
> tracking of fixes (so we won't do the same mistakes when we'll drop JDK21).
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/a618a336-a35e-40df-9d7d-d71c41cee4f3n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to