[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-2295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=161548#comment-161548
 ] 

Jay Blanton commented on JENKINS-2295:
--------------------------------------

We are having the exact same issue.  We just upgraded to the latest Hudson 
hoping a newer version of Hudson would resolve this issue, but it does not.

It seems that when we run this with a Maven 2.2.12 (for instance), we receive a 
different type of error, but when we run with Maven 3.0.4, we receive the same 
error.

We utilize the parameterized builds, so that we can minimize the amount of jobs 
that need to be created and taking advantage of the build form to provide the 
profiles (which contain modules), but this currently doesn't work (same details 
as Alon logged).  So everytime a user would want to run a job, they would have 
to modify it first to hard-code the profile...or create duplicate jobs with a 
hard-coded profile...which really doesn't take advantage of a parameterized 
profile.
                
> Jenkins cannot handle modules added by profiles - if profile is not activated 
> via '-P' (was: Assertion in MavenModuleSetBuild for aggregator POM with 
> modules provided by profile)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENKINS-2295
>                 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-2295
>             Project: Jenkins
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: maven2
>    Affects Versions: current
>         Environment: Platform: All, OS: All
>            Reporter: tjuerge
>         Attachments: testcase-build.log, testcase.tgz
>
>
> The root POM of one of our Maven2 projects aggregates sub-modules which are
> defined in a set of profiles. So within this POM there's no <modules> defined
> outside of a profile.
> Building this project from the commandline via "mvn -P<profile1>,<profileN>
> clean install" is working like a charme. But using the same commandline from
> within a Hudson (build 2.251) Maven2 job the following exception occurs after
> installing the root POM and starting to clean the first of the aggregated
> sub-modules:
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [ERROR] FATAL ERROR
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] reporters.get(com.acme.vk.backend:base)==null.
> reporters={com.acme.vk:base=[hudson.maven.reporters.MavenMailer@260657,
> hudson.maven.reporters.MavenArtifactArchiver@16339b2,
> hudson.maven.reporters.MavenFingerprinter@c2ea0b,
> hudson.maven.reporters.MavenJavadocArchiver@6a4209,
> hudson.maven.reporters.MavenSiteArchiver@1575b4,
> hudson.maven.reporters.SurefireArchiver@e284ab,
> hudson.maven.reporters.BuildInfoRecorder@1743073]}
> proxies={com.acme.vk:base=hudson.maven.MavenModuleSetBuild$Builder$FilterImpl@118e241}
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Trace
> java.lang.AssertionError: reporters.get(com.acme.vk.backend:base)==null.
> reporters={com.acme.vk:base=[hudson.maven.reporters.MavenMailer@260657,
> hudson.maven.reporters.MavenArtifactArchiver@16339b2,
> hudson.maven.reporters.MavenFingerprinter@c2ea0b,
> hudson.maven.reporters.MavenJavadocArchiver@6a4209,
> hudson.maven.reporters.MavenSiteArchiver@1575b4,
> hudson.maven.reporters.SurefireArchiver@e284ab,
> hudson.maven.reporters.BuildInfoRecorder@1743073]}
> proxies={com.acme.vk:base=hudson.maven.MavenModuleSetBuild$Builder$FilterImpl@118e241}
>       at
> hudson.maven.MavenModuleSetBuild$Builder.postModule(MavenModuleSetBuild.java:573)
>       at 
> hudson.maven.MavenBuilder$Adapter.fireLeaveModule(MavenBuilder.java:284)
>       at hudson.maven.MavenBuilder$Adapter.postBuild(MavenBuilder.java:242)
>       at
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.LifecycleExecutorInterceptor.execute(LifecycleExecutorInterceptor.java:45)
>       at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:336)
>       at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:129)
>       at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:287)
>       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>       at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
>       at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java:315)
>       at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255)
>       at hudson.maven.agent.Main.launch(Main.java:133)
>       at hudson.maven.MavenBuilder.call(MavenBuilder.java:139)
>       at 
> hudson.maven.MavenModuleSetBuild$Builder.call(MavenModuleSetBuild.java:543)
>       at 
> hudson.maven.MavenModuleSetBuild$Builder.call(MavenModuleSetBuild.java:489)
>       at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:69)
>       at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:23)
>       at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:213)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:417)
>       at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:269)
>       at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:123)
>       at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:650)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:675)
>       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
> Copying the <modules> block from one of the profiles directly into the root 
> POM
> "fixes" this issue.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to