[ 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-13735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

SCM/JIRA link daemon resolved JENKINS-13735.
--------------------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed
    
> Jenkins starts wrong slave for job restricted to specific one
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENKINS-13735
>                 URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-13735
>             Project: Jenkins
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: master-slave, slave-setup, vsphere-cloud
>    Affects Versions: current
>         Environment: Jenkins 1.463 under Tomcat6 on Linux (SLES 11), Windows 
> XP slave VMs controlled via vSphere Cloud plugin
>            Reporter: Marco Lehnort
>            Assignee: Kohsuke Kawaguchi
>              Labels: slave
>
> I'm using the following setup:
> - WinXP slaves A,B,C
> - jobs jA, jB, jC, tied to slaves A,B,C respectively using "Restrict where 
> this job can run"
> Assume all slaves are disconnected and powered off, no builds are queued.
> When starting a build manually, say jC, the following will happen:
> - job jC will be scheduled and also displayed accordingly in the build queue
> - tooltip will say it's waiting because slave C is offline
> - next, slave A is powered on by Jenkins and connection is established
> - jC will not be started, Jenkins seems to honor the restriction correctly
> - after some idle time, Jenkins realizes the slave is idle and causes shut 
> down
> - then, same procedure happens with slave B
> - on occasion, next one is slave A again
> - finally (on good luck?) slave C happens to be started
> - jC is executed
> It is possible that jC is waiting for hours (indefinitely?), because the 
> required
> slave is not powered on. I also observed this behaviour using a time-trigger
> instead of manual trigger, so I assume it is independent of the type of 
> trigger.
> Occasionally it also happens that the correct slave is powered up right away,
> but that seems to happen by chance. The concrete pattern is not obvious to me.
> Note that the component selection above is just my best guess.
> Cheers, Marco

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to