Jesse Glick resolved Bug JENKINS-17365 as Won't Fix

The previous storage format was ambiguous about what was a parameter filter and what was part of the job path for e.g. matrix jobs. As of 1.26 an unambiguous format is used.

There is a one-time migration which attempts to guess what you meant in the old case: if there is a / in the name, and there is a = in the name, and no job with the specified full name exists, then the name is split on the last /, with the first part being the project name and the second part being the parameter filter. Otherwise the name is assumed to be a matrix project name and the parameters field is left empty.

I am not surprised that this heuristic is not correct in every case but I am not sure if it can be improved. If you think it can, please file a pull request against this plugin with a test demonstrating the more precise migration using @LocalData.

Change By: Jesse Glick (03/Apr/13 5:10 PM)
Status: Open Resolved
Resolution: Won't Fix
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Reply via email to