|
||||||||
|
This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira |
||||||||
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
The excluded files and subdirs themselves only exist in the second depot. The first depot DOES have a similar upper portion of the path, however, we don't overlap the two in our Workspace specs.
So yes, depot1 contains a similar set of upper paths and they diverge, but we don't map them together in the workspace. If we had mapped the two together, the actual excluded subdirs and files only exist in depot2 - there wouldn't be any collisions.
So for ex. this exists in depot1 (the "ItemsX" share the same names in our Perforce):
"//depot1/ITEMA/Item B/..."
and depot2:
"//ITEMA/Item B/<newfoldernotinfirstdepot>/config/buildinfo/..."
ITEMA is the name of our second depot.