|
||||||||
|
This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira |
||||||||
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
VERY much appreciate the transparency of process here.
It sounds like some of you genuinely care that this language is highly offensive outside of this tech bubble we're in, but the sad reality is redit/hn flame-throwing tends to be the biggest motivation for making these kind of changes and saving face.
As for next steps, what I've gathered from the meeting is SUBJ terminology will likely be addressed. That's good, but satisfactory would be a change in terminology similar to Django. However, the idea of making that kind of change sounded unfavorable in the meeting logs, so can you clarify exactly what changes will and will not be made regarding this issue?
Thanks!