Jenkins is using a custom patched version of svnkit. Chances are that work will need to be done on the 1.7 version as well, which is still in beta. However, this does not prevent you from upgrading your subversion server to 1.7 to support other 1.7 clients, as the 1.7 server supports 1.6 clients as well. Jenkins will work fine if the server is updated, or even other clients on the jenkins machine.
On Feb 6, 2012 7:39 AM, "Martijn Verburg" <martijnverb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hmm, must be my bad - I was sure I read of the support somewhere (it's > my reason for upgrading as well) - M > > On 6 February 2012 14:23, shanz <duncan.perr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Martijn, > > I seem to already have the latest version of th plugin though (1.37) > > and 1.38 doesn't address svn 1.7 format yet ... > > Version 1.38 (not yet released) > > > > Fixed issue #10227: Parameter "List subversion tag" was not > > displaying tags which have the same date. > > Fixed issue #12201: NullPointerException during SVN update. > > Fixed issue #8036: Subversion plugin to support SVN::Web browser. > > Fixed issue #12525: SVN URL converted to lowercase -> Changes > > found every time it has an pull request. > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 6, 2:07 pm, Martijn Verburg <martijnverb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I believe the latest version of the Jenkins plugin does provide > >> support. However, > >> Several of us have been having problems upgrading the SVN plugin (this was > >> originally thought to be an hpi vs jpi naming issue, but it seems to > >> be deeper than > >> that). > >> > >> I didn't have a chance to discuss it in detail with KK at FOSDEM, but I know a > >> few of the devs were discussing it. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Martijn > >> > >> On 6 February 2012 14:02, shanz <duncan.perr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Just seen this on svnkit website ... > >> > >> > Lastest stable version of SVNKit (1.3.7) is not compatible with > >> > Subversion 1.7 working copy format. However, SVNKit 1.7 is under > >> > development now and we plan to release it in February 2012. Fully > >> > functional beta will be ready in January 2012. > >> > >> > Right now you may use SVNKit 1.7.0-alpha2 version, which is available > >> > in our maven repository or build SVNKit 1.7.0 from sources. SVNKit > >> > 1.7.0-alpha2 is compatible both with the new and old working copy > >> > formats, but does not yet support all of the Subversion operations. > >> > >> > On Feb 6, 1:55 pm, shanz <duncan.perr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> I don't think I've got a choice since my Company is about to PUSH svn > >> >> 1.7 out automatically. > >> >> Today I've tried it out but now realise Jenkins isn't ready for it! > >> > >> >> On Feb 6, 1:48 pm, <matthew.web...@diamond.ac.uk> wrote: > >> > >> >> > SVN 1.7 is a major change from 1.6. Subversion 1.7 clients use a new working copy format. Subversion 1.7 clients cannot use Subversion 1.6 (and earlier) working copies. Existing working copies created with Subversion 1.6 and earlier need to be upgraded before they can be used with a Subversion 1.7 client. > >> > >> >> > If you are thinking of moving to subversion 1.7, consider all the tools you use. For example, we use Jenkins, subversion command line, subversion from Eclipse, etc. We won’t move until we can upgrade all of them. There's no point in Jenkins checking out in 1.7 format, if I can’t use the command line to look at the result (I have to do that occasionally). > >> > >> >> > Hope that helps > >> >> > Matthew > >> > >> >> > > -----Original Message----- > >> >> > > From: jenkinsci-users@googlegroups.com [mailto: jenkinsci-users@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of shanz > >> >> > > Sent: 06 February 2012 13:34 > >> >> > > To: Jenkins Users > >> >> > > Subject: svn 1.7 > >> > >> >> > > Can Jenkins support svn 1.7? > >> >> > > My job complains with - "Please upgrade your Subversion (SVNKit) > >> >> > > client to use this working copy". > >> >> > > Can I manually upgrade SVNKit? > >> >> > > I'm using Jenkins 1.442. > >> >> > > Is it worth upgrading to Jenkins 1.450? > >> > >> >> > > Does anyone use svn 1.7.x with Jenkins successfully? > >> > >> >> > -- > >> >> > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail. > >> >> > Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd. > >> >> > Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message. > >> >> > Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom
