The idea is to alternate the time and thereby distributing the pain of 
timezones ☺

From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Young-il Choi 
<[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, 19 April 2017 at 11:39
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [jerryscript-dev] Meeting notes community call 19-04




I am afraid that we have to join the next meeting at midnight.

It seems that it is hard to make all happy. How about that the least happy side 
decide next schedule ?

Next time, I will decide :)



Regards,

Youngil



--------- Original Message ---------

Sender : Jan Jongboom <[email protected]>

Date : 2017-04-19 18:16 (GMT+9)

Title : Re: [jerryscript-dev] Meeting notes community call 19-04


3 May!

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Young-il Choi 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:



Is it correct that next meeting will be  Wednesday 3 March 2017 ?



--------- Original Message ---------

Sender : Jan Jongboom <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

Date : 2017-04-19 18:08 (GMT+9)

Title : [jerryscript-dev] Meeting notes community call 19-04


Hi all,

Next meeting will be Wednesday 3 March 2017, 3PM UTC, 4PM UK, 5PM CET, 8AM PST, 
11AM EST, midnight South Korea, 11PM Shanghai.

You can join the meeting via https://meet.intel.com/martijn.the/8VOOMYPR 
<https://meet.intel.com/martijn.the/8VOOMYPR>

Here are the meeting notes of today:

TL;DR:

* Face-to-face meeting planned for September 2017 in Hungary.
* Will alternate schedule of community calls between morning/afternoon EU, so 
US can join as well.
* Intel to work on module proposal for sharing native modules between ports.

---

Heiko (Intel)
Martijn (Intel)
Zidong (Intel)
Szeged team
Jan (ARM)
Rob (ARM)

Zidong: any projects who use JerryScript in production environment? It's 
important for jerry-util to proceed.
Martijn: Pebble.
Szeged: None to our knowledge.
Jan: Neither on mbed.

Heiko: what about products that are about to be released?
Martijn: Mark Juskin(?) is opening issues again, might be working on a product.
Should reach out to him and others and see what they're running against to. 
Fitbit.

Hop.js could be, demo'ed at Embedded World on STM silicon.

Alternating schedule US / EU? We lose maybe South-Korea. But Zephyr.js could 
join, which is great.

Next meeting scheduled 5PM CET on Wednesday in two weeks, see if people can 
join. Zidong will try.

Coming back from last meeting: jerryscript-util state. PR is openend, looking 
for feedback right now. Martijn is happy about the discussion and its flexible 
enough.

Hungarian team, do maintenance work right now, not much new work. Want to 
improve on existing ports.

Martijn: Szeged was working on tooling, developer experience. Debugging 
support. What's the plans there? What needs to be improved?

Szeged: Long term project. Covers this year. Planning to work on memory 
profiler.

Szeged: Want feedback on the debugger. Working on Visual Studio Code extension. 
But it's all longer term work, not the next few weeks.

Martijn: Can we share these plans somewhere?

Szeged: Will open GH issues for them.

Face to face meetings. Jan: September OK? Or too late? Probably good September.

Martijn: Need someone to run it.

Jan will own it.

New mailing list is officially in place. Groups.io will be used from now on. 
Already reflected on GitHub as well.

Szeged: New feature: adding timeout mechanism for scripts, are implementing it 
in the next few weeks, as a compile-time enabled feature. Checking for JMP 
backwards. Soft counter is implemented here, if in infinite loop then can be 
detected, will terminate the script.

Heiko/Martijn: Can we join some of the work on enabling timers in JerryScript 
with this? Not sure how it would be implemented.

Martijn: we merged user context API. Per context, and per binding piece of 
bookkeeping. Was discussing with Gabriel, working on building a utility on top 
of this API, like a module manager, similar to require(). Requires bookkeeping. 
ES6 spec has abstract module record (for import/export). Modules have state, 
need to have a handle related to that state. Native bindings also need this. 
Would it make sense to add something to jerry-core that implements abstract 
module record? So we can add import/require()/native bindings on top of it.

Szeged: so we want to have module registering and retrieving be maintained by 
jerry-core?

Martijn: Not accessible by JavaScript, but it's useful for maintaining the 
bindings.

Szeged: This should be part of utils, as you can choose what implementation you 
want depending on the workload. But can figure out something more generic. Hard 
to decide what's the best approach. Modules need to be handled by the 
environment. Not sure.

Martijn: we need to find a way of loading modules from variety of sources, mbed 
/ Zephyr / Intel all invent their own.

Szeged: main concern is with the size. We want JS to remain small as possible.

Martijn: will come with a concrete proposal.





[cid:[email protected]]



_______________________________________________

jerryscript-dev mailing list

[email protected]

https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/jerryscript-dev





[cid:[email protected]]

[http://ext.samsung.net/mail/ext/v1/external/status/update?userid=duddlf.choi&do=bWFpbElEPTIwMTcwNDE5MDkzOTAwZXBjbXMxcDI0MTVlM2VmZTMyODc1NWQ4ZTQxNWYxMjlkMGY3YzRhMyZyZWNpcGllbnRBZGRyZXNzPWplcnJ5c2NyaXB0LWRldkBncm91cHMuaW8_]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Benelux B.V.
Registered in The Netherlands under number 24134020
Statutory seat: Rotterdam
Registered address: Capronilaan 37, 1119NG Schiphol-Rijk

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
_______________________________________________
jerryscript-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/jerryscript-dev

Reply via email to