I need my rules to behave differently when a fact already exist in the system. In a C syntax-like, what I want to do would be like:
if cf3 does not exist, then cf3 = min (cf1, cf2) else cf3 = min {cf1, cf2, cf3} cf is a certainty factor. I have found that this can be done by using two rules like: (defrule rule1 (x1 value1 ?cf1) (x2 value2 ?cf2) (x3 value3 ?cf3) => (assert (x3 value3 (min ?cf1 ?cf2 ?cf3))) ) (defrule rule2 (x1 value1 ?cf1) (x2 value2 ?cf2) => (assert (x3 value3 (min ?cf1 ?cf2))) ) By this way, the number of rules of the system would duplicate. Is there a better solution? Thanks a lot Fernando Bobillo -------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------