I think [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Option B using (fact), yet to be implemented:
>
> (assert-across-engines ?rete (fact (a-new-fact ?parameter)))
>
> (2) Asserting the fact in the target engine is straightforward.
>
> Option A works right out of the box. I'd vote for the introduction of a
> (fact) function, though. After all, it seems to be pretty useful.
>
Such a function would be fairly simple to add although it would add a
wart to the inside of the already ugly parser. I will keep it in
mind. See my other message regarding the new "call-on-engine" function
that can also be used to solve this problem.
---------------------------------------------------------
Ernest Friedman-Hill
Distributed Systems Research Phone: (925) 294-2154
Sandia National Labs FAX: (925) 294-2234
Org. 8920, MS 9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PO Box 969 http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov
Livermore, CA 94550
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the
list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
