Gabriel, I have changed JADE in order to start a JADE container from within the JessTab and that works fine. So you can combine them all. But the JessTab functions sometimes work inconsistently when JESS is run on it's own (not in the JessTab, but with a jess.Console). :) Oliver Hoffmann At 11:05 24.04.01 +0200, Gabriel Hopmans wrote: >I don't have experience with Protégé but it seems very interesting. >Buddy Kresge wrote that you can load Jess as a plug-in, but how far and what >can you do with Protégé when you are using JADE and Jess? >I suspect you can't embed them all, but that you have to work with two >separate 'environments'. >Has anyone experience with both? > >__________________________________________________ >Gabriel Hopmans >IST-researcher >Multi-Agent Systems Technology >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >University Maastricht >Section Communications Research & Semiotics >Grote Gracht 82, Maastricht >P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands >T + 31 43 388.2769 / 2767 >F + 31 43 388.2744 >M + 31 6 27.237.606 >__________________________________________________ > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Buddy Kresge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "'Jones, David H'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 6:03 PM >Subject: RE: JESS: JESS and richer declarative knowledge > > >Check out Protégé at Stanford University. > >The link is http://protege.stanford.edu > >You can then load in (as a plug in) Jess. >This gives you jess functionality embedded in >an Ontological environment. > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Jones, David H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 11:45 AM >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >Subject: JESS: JESS and richer declarative knowledge > > >Have anyone examined or can anyone speculate on how JESS could make use of >richer declarative knowledge, such as what can be found in an ontology >encoded in Standard-OIL (as described in >http://www.ontoknowledge.org/oil/downl/semantics.pdf). In particular, OIL >has constructs for defining axioms about classes (disjoint, covered, >disjoint-covered, equivalent), and slot properties (transitive, symmetric, >functional, inverse). How would/could the JESS engine or a JESS program >make use of these additional semantics? > > > > >Regards, > >David H. Jones >Boeing Phantom Works, >Mathematics and Computing Technology >425-865-6924 >425-865-2964 (FAX) >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]' >in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the >list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]' >in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the >list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]' >in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the >list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >--------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------
