I think Xiaocheng Luan wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm not sure if this is a limitation, a bug, or just I'm not using > it the right way. In the following example, logical CE has rather > strange behavior - two rules interfere with each other. Any ideas? >
Looks like an incremental reset problem with "logical." "Incremental reset" refers to what Jess has to do whan you add new rules to a Rete network that already has facts in it. Here, I think the relevant sequence is defining a rule with "logical", running to produce facts with logical dependencies, then defining another rule with similar logical dependency specifications. If you're not using "logical" at all this this won't affect you. If you're using Jess in the more common mode of defining all the rules, then running the complete system, this won't come up; but otherwise, this looks like a bug. Thanks for the report; I'll fill you in when I know more. --------------------------------------------------------- Ernest Friedman-Hill Distributed Systems Research Phone: (925) 294-2154 Sandia National Labs FAX: (925) 294-2234 PO Box 969, MS 9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Livermore, CA 94550 http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov -------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
