I think Mithun Sheshagiri wrote: > "logical" construct which has been reported and fixed in the 6.1p7 version > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg05983.html
Note that this is an incremental reset problem only -- i.e., it only happens if the rules are defined after the facts they operate on. Do things in the "right" order, and there's no problem. > > 1. To store the fact-id/of all the facts and use the retract command This is a reasonable thing to do. > > I own the book "Jess in Action" and therefore have a 6.1p4 version of > Jess. Is there a legitimate way of getting my hands on Node1RTL.class > which fixes the bug with the logical construct. You're writing from an .edu address, which means you're eligible for a free academic license. Write to Craig Smith, [EMAIL PROTECTED], to request yours. --------------------------------------------------------- Ernest Friedman-Hill Science and Engineering PSEs Phone: (925) 294-2154 Sandia National Labs FAX: (925) 294-2234 PO Box 969, MS 9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Livermore, CA 94550 http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov -------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
