Hi Matt,

All of Wolfgang's suggestions are good. I just wanted to add that for classification (an application I'm personally working on right now), one method is to develop a formal decision tree and then make it more or less explicit in the rules. By this I mean have decisions (which correspond to internal nodes of the tree) assert explicit working memory elements to represent the fact that the decision path has flowed through them (i.e., (consulted node-27)) and both decision and leaf nodes match these facts. This lets your ensure that only one leaf rule will fire. Did I explain that well enough?


On Apr 17, 2008, at 5:34 PM, Matthew J Hutchinson wrote:
Hi everyone,

After using Jess in college, I'm looking at using it for some other more serious work and realized I still had some lingering questions:

- One of the strengths of Jess is that we can just put facts in and no algorithm is needed - rules fire and hey presto! But when multiple rules fire (especially in the cases where there is some "overlap" in the criteria that make various rules fire) are there good approaches to harness all these firings and distill them back into one outcome which is all too often what's required when combining Jess with other procedural systems?

I hope that makes sense. I can see how in some cases firing multiple rules and having different paths is great, but in a case such as classification (just off the top of my head) only 1 outcome is desired.

Are there particular phrases I can use when looking for literature to do with this?


Cheers,
Matt



---------------------------------------------------------
Ernest Friedman-Hill
Informatics & Decision Sciences          Phone: (925) 294-2154
Sandia National Labs                FAX:   (925) 294-2234
PO Box 969, MS 9012                 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Livermore, CA 94550                 http://www.jessrules.com




--------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list
(use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to