Hello Horatio, I'm out of town right now but can address this next week when I return. There are a couple of issues ... 1 . I have to review things and think about this proposal. 2. I have to see if I can get the source code released to you (been working on this for a long time but some progress has been made recently).
Bob Orchard On 2013-03-09, at 8:13 AM, Horacio Paggi wrote: > Dear Sirs: > In the docs attached to the FuzzyJess Toolkit it is mentioned the use of > certainty factors in the rules' specifications. As long as I understand, to > allow the processing of the rules, these values should be static in order to > be be determined prior the execution of any rule. However, it's very luring > to have VARIABLE CFs so they can be changed automatically as long the system > is used (so it learns in some way). Do you think that this is possible?In > your opinion, what would be the required effort to implement this change? > I'm asking this because I have to mentor a degree student, in his final > engineering project (comprising a whole year) and I was thinking in yo have > him implement it and build a brief application of the modified FuzzyJess, > but I do not want to overwhelm him. > Thank you in advance for your advice, > Horacio Paggi -------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [email protected]' in the BODY of a message to [email protected], NOT to the list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify [email protected]. --------------------------------------------------------------------
