Roger Ruttimann wrote: > I'm in favor of having a portals applications branch that would be a > different repository than Jetspeed. We should follow the same path as > portals-bridges. >
It all depends what you mean by "follow the same path as portals-bridges". If we're talking only about the repository move then defintiely +1 but I'd be very wary of creating specific community tools for the moved code (ie mailing lists, jira, etc...) at least until there's a known interest from an applications-only community. > Jetspeed is the portal framework that includes everything that's needed > to setup and configure the WebPortal. Portals applications should > include applications that can be deployed into any portal. > Separating the applications from the framework code will be appealing to > application developers which like to contribute applications but don't > like to deal with building/installing the portal before they can start > developing an portlet application. > > The Demo stuff could be a subset of applications. > > Roger > -- Raphaël Luta - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Portals - Enterprise Portal in Java http://portals.apache.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
