On 5/31/07, David Sean Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 31, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Edgar Poce wrote: > >> In general I would like >> to not introduce anymore new ways to parse XML into Jetspeed >> As I have stated on this list before, we have like 5 different ways >> to parse XML built into Jetspeed today such as Castor, Digester >> Would be best to settle on one approach >> > > I'm using DOM which is included in the jdk, but I can change to other > strategy if needed. Sorry, don't mean to tell you how to do things. DOM with the JDK is fine by me
Don't worry, I appreciate your feedback.I don't have any preference on implementations details to make the JCR page manager work. Moreover, since it's a j2 extension I'd like it to be aligned with the j2 design choices.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
