[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JS2-1093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Woonsan Ko resolved JS2-1093.
-----------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

> To use #parse() velocity macro can cause unexpected behavior with Velocity 1.5
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JS2-1093
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JS2-1093
>             Project: Jetspeed 2
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Admin Portlets, Layout
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.0
>            Reporter: Woonsan Ko
>            Assignee: Woonsan Ko
>             Fix For: 2.2.1
>
>
> I think it hasn't been a good practice to use "#parse" macro in header.vm to 
> use velocity macros with Velocity 1.5.
> In the documentation of Velocity 1.5, it says, "because the #parse() happens 
> at runtime, and the parser decides if a VM-looking element in the template is 
> a VM at  parsetime, #parse()-ing a set of VM declarations won't work as 
> expected. To get around this, simply use the velocimacro.library facility to 
> have Velocity load your VMs at startup." [1] By the way, we cannot use 
> velocitymacro.library facility because each layout decorator should be able 
> to have each own macros.
> Luckily, by the way, Velocity 1.6 seems to have already resolved this problem!
> It says, "Yes! This became possible in Velocity 1.6." in the same section. [2]
> Therefore, I'd like to try to upgrade the velocity version to 1.6.3.
> [1] 
> http://velocity.apache.org/engine/releases/velocity-1.5/user-guide.html#velocimacro_miscellany
> [2] 
> http://velocity.apache.org/engine/releases/velocity-1.6.2/user-guide.html#Velocimacro_Miscellany

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to